Start here if you're new
what it is
Warner Music runs 2 businesses, recorded music and publishing, then gets paid when songs stream or get licensed.
how it gets paid
Last year Warner Music made $6.7B in revenue. Recorded Music Streaming was the main engine at $3.7B, or 55% of sales.
why it's growing
Revenue grew 4.4% last year. Revenue rose 10% vs. prior year, helped by 9% growth in recorded music subscription streaming.
what just happened
WMG posted $1.8B in revenue, but EPS of $0.33 missed the $0.36 estimate by 8.33%.
At a glance
B++ balance sheet — above average — nothing keeping you up at night
35/100 earnings predictability — expect surprises
44.9x trailing p/e — you're paying up for this one
2.6% dividend yield — cash in your pocket every quarter
20.0% return on capital — nothing to write home about
xvary composite: 50/100 — below average
What they do
Warner Music runs 2 businesses, recorded music and publishing, then gets paid when songs stream or get licensed.
Recorded Music was 82% of 2024 revenue. Your money rides on 2 paid uses: streaming and licensing. Leaving is painful because 1 hit can keep paying for years.
How they make money
$6.7B
annual revenue · their business grew +4.4% last year
Recorded Music Streaming
$3.7B
+9.0%
Recorded Music Other
$1.8B
0.0%
Music Publishing
$1.2B
+4.4%
The products that matter
licenses and monetizes master recordings
Recorded Music
$5.5B · 82% of revenue
This is the center of gravity: $5.5B of revenue tied to streaming, licensing, and music sales. When you think about Warner, start here.
core revenue driver
owns and licenses compositions
Music Publishing
$1.2B · 18% of revenue
This segment gets paid when songs show up in film, ads, games, and streaming. It's smaller than recorded music, but it gives you a second route to monetizing the same creative output.
second royalty stream
adjacent businesses and smaller bets
Emerging Ventures
not separately broken out
The page does not break out revenue here. That tells you something. The thesis still lives with the $5.5B recorded music engine and the $1.2B publishing arm.
not thesis-driving yet
Key numbers
$43
share target
That is 39% above $30.95, so the market is paying for a rerate.
44.9x
price to profit
You are paying 44.9 times last year profit for a business with 10.3% operating margin.
20.0%
profit on capital
That means $1 invested in the business has been turning into $0.20 of operating profit.
$4.4B
debt load
Debt is 21% of capital, so the balance sheet is decent, not bulletproof.
Financial health
B++
strength
- balance sheet grade B++ — above average financial health
- risk rank 3 — safer than 50% of stocks
- price stability 50 / 100
- long-term debt $4.4B (21% of capital)
- net profit margin 15.4% — keeps 15 cents of every dollar in revenue
- return on equity 44% — $0.44 profit for every $1 investors have put in
B++ — functional but not a standout on the balance sheet.
Total return vs. market
You invested $10,000 in WMG 3 years ago → it's now worth $9,610.
The index would have given you $14,770.
source: institutional data · total return
What just happened
missed estimates
WMG posted $1.8B in revenue, but EPS of $0.33 missed the $0.36 estimate by 8.33%.
Revenue rose 10% vs. prior year, helped by 9% growth in recorded music subscription streaming. EPS was $0.33, so the quarter was a top-line beat and an earnings miss at the same time.
$1.8B
revenue
$0.33
eps
10.0%
revenue growth
EPS miss
The $0.33 print matters because it missed $0.36 by 8.33% even though revenue still grew 10%.
-
warner music group’s shares have struggled to maintain positive price momentum.
-
the equity’s price performance has been rocky at best over the past five years.while we believe the stock has wide potential for both intermediate- and long-term capital gains, operating performance has been choppy since the company went public back in 2020. most recently, gaap earnings comparisons for fiscal 2025 (year ended september 30th) were lackluster ($0.69 a share, down from $0.83 in fiscal 2024). although revenues advanced, hefty operating costs, restructuring, amortization, and foreign exchange effects compressed the bottom line last fiscal year. on the upside, we are optimistic about a solid earnings recovery in fiscal 2026. (note: the company was scheduled to report its results after this review went to press.) we are switching to non-gaap presentation in 2026 to reflect warner music group’s adjusted oibda reporting method. entering fiscal 2026, we see conditions improving as restructuring savings increasingly benefit profitability and streaming trends normalize. for the first quarter ended december 31, 2025, we estimate revenue of approximately $1.75 billion and non-gaap earnings per share of $0.52, reflecting improved operating leverage and a clearer earnings trajectory.
-
we are on the long-term operational prospects.top- and bottom-line growth ought to be propelled by sustained global streaming growth, continued market-share gains, and periodic pricing adjustments with digital streaming platforms. in addition, expanding monetization of warner’s catalog across new formats, including emerging ai-enabled licensing opportunities augur well for revenue and profit growth out to late decade.
-
despite the wide appreciation potential here, investors should be mindful of some caveats.given that wmg is the only publicly traded stand-alone music label and publisher, we believe the operational growth prospects are solid.
-
still, the p/e multiple is quite rich at more than 30 times earnings.
source: Warner Music Group earnings report, February 2026
Get this snapshot in your inbox
This page, delivered free — plus weekly updates when the numbers change. plain english, no spam.
weekly updates
earnings alerts
plain english
no spam
What could go wrong
Warner's biggest risk is simple: the part of the company that matters most is also the part you have to trust most. Recorded Music is $5.5B of revenue, or 82% of the business, so small changes in payout economics or artist performance do not stay small for long.
high
streaming payout pressure hits the core engine first
Recorded Music generates $5.5B and accounts for 82% of revenue. If platform economics worsen or payout rates become less favorable, most of the company feels it. This is concentration risk with a playlist.
82% of revenue sits in the segment most exposed to streaming economics
med
premium multiple meets uneven predictability
The stock trades at 44.9x trailing earnings while earnings predictability scores 35/100. That's a rough combination. When the multiple is rich, small misses tend to get treated like bigger problems.
valuation is asking for steadier execution than the predictability score shows
med
$4.4B of long-term debt narrows the margin for error
Long-term debt sits at $4.4B, or 21% of capital. The balance sheet grades out at B++, which is fine. Fine is different from flush. That matters more if growth stays muted or catalog spending rises.
less balance-sheet flexibility than the royalty-story pitch might imply
med
hit-driven businesses are durable, not perfectly smooth
The appeal of music rights is long-tail cash flow. The catch is that the front end still depends on new releases, artist performance, and catalog relevance. A 35/100 predictability score is the market's way of saying this is not a utility.
steady catalog economics do not erase the volatility of hit creation
If Recorded Music slows and the multiple stays rich, you get the worst pairing in investing: slower fundamentals and a valuation that still expects more.
source: institutional data · regulatory filings · risk analysis
Pay attention to
earnings
next earnings growth rate
Watch whether revenue growth stays above last year's 4.4% pace. That's the cleanest live test of whether this stock deserves a premium multiple.
metric
recorded music concentration
82% of revenue comes from Recorded Music. You do not need every segment working. You need this one working.
risk
streaming payout trends
The biggest operating risk is simple: if streaming economics worsen, the $5.5B core segment has nowhere to hide.
trend
ownership support versus weak momentum
Institutions have been net buyers for two straight quarters while technicals sit in the bottom bucket. One of those signals usually gives first.
Analyst rankings
short-term outlook
below average
momentum score 4 — in human-speak, analysts think the next stretch could stay choppy.
risk profile
average
stability score 3 — you are not buying a bunker stock, but this is not a chaos name either.
chart momentum
bottom 5%
technical score 5 — the weakest bucket. The tape has been worse than the business.
earnings predictability
35 / 100
Earnings predictability is low. Translation: expect less consistency than you would get from a steadier recurring-revenue model.
source: institutional data
Institutional activity
institutions have been net buying for 2 consecutive quarters — 172 buyers vs. 119 sellers in 3q2025. total institutional holdings: 0.2B shares. net buying for 2 quarters.
source: institutional data
Price targets
3-5 year target range
$27
$59
$31
current price
$43
target midpoint · +39% from current · 3-5yr high: $95 (+205% · 33% ann'l return)
Want the deeper analysis?
The full deep dive: dcf model, scenario analysis, competitive moat breakdown, and quarterly tracking — everything on this page, taken further.
see plans from $5/moThe deep dive