Start here if you're new
what it is
Skyward sells niche business insurance policies where pricing discipline matters more than being the biggest player.
how it gets paid
Last year Skyward Specialty did on the order of $1.4B in net earned premium / insurance revenue (aligned to the segment split below).
why it's growing
Revenue grew 16.0% last year. That is the kind of quarterly print that makes a 12.6x trailing P/E look cheap.
what just happened
Skyward just posted $3.03 EPS in the latest quarter, up sharply vs. prior year—quarter prints can spike next to the calmer ~16% full-year revenue trend.
At a glance
B++ balance sheet — above average — nothing keeping you up at night
12.6x trailing p/e — the market's not buying it — or you found a deal
14.6% return on capital — nothing to write home about
$2.87 fy2024 eps est
~$1.4B FY2024 revenue (reported scale)
xvary composite: 53/100 — below average
What they do
Skyward sells niche business insurance policies where pricing discipline matters more than being the biggest player.
Skyward wins by staying in specialty markets where underwriting skill decides who gets paid and who gets wrecked. It runs 8 underwriting divisions and only 580 employees, which tells you this is a focused operator, not a giant bureaucracy. In insurance, underwriting → pricing risk correctly → so what: if they pick better risks than competitors, your capital compounds without needing huge market share.
How they make money
$1.4B
annual revenue · their business grew +16.0% last year
total revenue
$1.4B
+16.0%
The products that matter
core specialty underwriting
Property & Casualty
$1.1B · 78.6% of revenue
it's the core business at $1.1B of revenue, and the latest quarter still posted an 88.5% combined ratio.
underwriting engine
lloyd's market platform
Apollo
$0.3B · 21.4% of revenue
this business already represents 21.4% of revenue, which makes the january 2026 acquisition less of a side project and more of an execution test.
new but material
niche commercial coverage
Power Generation Coverage
launched feb 2026
launched in feb 2026, so it matters more as a signal of underwriting appetite than as a reported revenue driver — for now.
watch the rollout
Key numbers
$2.87
fy2024 eps
EPS → profit per share → so what: that is up from $2.24 in 2023, a 28.1% jump, which tells you profits grew faster than the stock's sleepy 12.6x multiple suggests.
14.6%
return on capital
Return on capital → profit earned on the money used in the business → so what: 14.6% says Skyward is not just growing, it is putting capital to work at a solid rate.
$20M
long-term debt
Long-term debt → money owed over years → so what: at just 1% of capital, debt is a side character here, not the plot.
12.6x
trailing p/e
P/E → price divided by profits → so what: you are paying 12.6 times trailing earnings for a company that grew annual EPS 28.1% from $2.24 to $2.87.
Financial health
B++
strength
- balance sheet grade B++ — above average financial health
- risk rank 4 — safer than 20% of stocks
- price stability 45 / 100
- long-term debt $20M (1% of capital)
B++ — functional but not a standout on the balance sheet.
Total return vs. market
Return history isn't available for SKWD right now.
source: institutional data · return history unavailable
What just happened
beat estimates
Skyward just posted $3.03 EPS in the latest quarter, up sharply vs. prior year—treat giant vs. prior year% revenue lines in feeds as noisy until they foot to the ~$1.4B FY premium map.
A $6M “revenue” cell next to a $1.4B company total is almost always a wrong line or wrong scale from the vendor—ignore it here and reconcile the quarter in the 10-Q.
$1.4B
revenue (FY anchor)
$3.03
eps (Q)
88.5%
combined ratio (Q · P&C)
the number that mattered
$3.03 quarterly EPS mattered because it signals underwriting leverage; pair it to the 88.5% combined ratio and the ~$1.4B FY scale so the story stays one company, not three different feeds.
source: company earnings report, 2026
Get this snapshot in your inbox
This page, delivered free — plus weekly updates when the numbers change. plain english, no spam.
weekly updates
earnings alerts
plain english
no spam
What could go wrong
the #1 risk is combined ratio slippage after the Apollo buildout.
high
underwriting discipline slips
an 88.5% combined ratio is excellent. if claims costs or expenses push that back toward the mid-90s, the cheap multiple will stop looking cheap.
this company does not have a moat to cover bad underwriting. the underwriting is the moat substitute.
high
apollo integration disappoints
the Lloyd's platform was acquired for $41.7M and already represents 21.4% of revenue. that makes execution risk material on day one.
if Apollo adds complexity faster than profits, the current growth narrative turns into an operating drag.
med
reserve development reverses
one bright spot in the quarter was a 59.6% loss ratio in surety and property lines with favorable prior-period development. that tailwind does not repeat forever.
if reserve help fades, future quarters have to stand on current pricing strength alone.
med
the market keeps asking for more proof
the stock trades at $42.80, near the bottom of a $42–$65 range, despite a profitable quarter. that tells you investors still doubt how durable the recent numbers are.
you can be right on the business and still wait longer than you want for the multiple to move.
if the 88.5% combined ratio drifts higher while Apollo already accounts for 21.4% of revenue, the entire “cheap quality insurer” setup gets weaker fast.
source: institutional data · regulatory filings · risk analysis
Pay attention to
metric
combined ratio staying below 90%
this is the kill-criteria number in plain sight. if SKWD stops writing profitable business, the rest of the story matters less.
calendar
q1 2026 earnings report
the next quarter needs to show the q4 beat was not a one-quarter flex. you want premium growth and underwriting discipline in the same release.
trend
apollo becoming productive, not just larger
a business that already makes up 21.4% of revenue has to improve the mix, not just add reporting complexity.
risk
analyst target gap versus market skepticism
the average target on the page is $66. the stock is $42.80. one of those numbers is too optimistic, or the market is still behind.
Analyst rankings
risk profile
below average
risk rank 4 — more volatile than most — brace for bigger swings.
chart momentum
average
momentum rank 3 — the stock is moving with the broader market, no unusual signal.
source: institutional data
Institutional activity
institutional ownership data for SKWD is being compiled.
source: institutional data
Price targets
3-5 year target range
n/a
n/a
$43
current price
n/a
target midpoint · n/a from current
Want the deeper analysis?
The full deep dive: dcf model, scenario analysis, competitive moat breakdown, and quarterly tracking — everything on this page, taken further.
see plans from $5/moThe deep dive