Siebert Financial
SIEB
Siebert Financial
Financials Small Cap Updated Mar 13, 2026

Siebert turns $84M of revenue into a 22.8% operating margin, and the stock still trades at $1.94.

If you own this stock, you need to know whether a tiny broker can keep paying its bills.

$1.94
Market cap ~$86M · 52-week range
49
Composite
Our overall rating — combines growth, value, risk, and momentum
49
/ 100

Below Average

Combines growth, value, risk, and momentum factors into a single institutional-grade score.

What it is
Siebert helps people trade stocks, get advice, buy insurance, and use online brokerage tools.
How it gets paid
Last year Siebert Financial made $84M in revenue. retail brokerage was the main engine at $38M, or 45% of sales.
growth snapshot
Revenue was roughly flat last year at $84M. retail brokerage is still the main line to watch.
What just happened
March 30, 2026 is the next proof point. consolidated revenue was roughly flat last year at ~$84M—if the next print turns negative or brokerage slips from its ~+3%.
C++ balance sheet — some cracks in the foundation
40/100 earnings predictability — expect surprises
10.8x trailing p/e — the market's not buying it — or you found a deal
15.2% return on capital — nothing to write home about
$0.33 fy2024 eps est
XVARY composite: 49/100 — below average
Siebert helps people trade stocks, get advice, buy insurance, and use online brokerage tools.
Siebert runs brokerage (stock-trading accounts), advisory (paid investing help), insurance, and tech under one roof. That is four main revenue lines in the table with 146 employees, which is absurdly small for an $84M revenue base. You leave a setup like this only after moving accounts, advice, and paperwork all at once. The Kakao Pay tie-up reaches 8 million Korean investors, so the firm gets distribution without building branches.
financials small-cap brokerage advisory fintech
$84M annual revenue · their business grew +0.0% last year
retail brokerage
$38M
+3.0%
investment advisory
$22M
+6.0%
insurance
$10M
−2.0%
technology development
$8M
+18.0%
media entertainment
$6M
flat
Stock and options trading
Retail Brokerage
$38M · ~45% of revenue
matches the retail brokerage line in the table (~ +3% growth there). if this slows, most of the story slows with it.
core revenue driver
Investment advisory platform
Investment Advisory
$22M · ~26% of revenue
the table shows ~ +6% growth here—not flat. it still needs to diversify you away from pure brokerage risk.
+6% in table
Employee stock plan management
Stock Plan Services
revenue not broken out
it sits inside an $84M company, but the current snapshot does not break out segment revenue. thin disclosure is its own data point when you are judging durability.
niche exposure
10.8x
trailing p/e
You are paying 10.8 times profit for a tiny financial firm. That is cheap only if the earnings do not wobble.
22.8%
operating margin
This is the profit left after running the business. At 22.8%, Siebert keeps more than many bigger financial firms.
15.2%
return on capital
This says how hard the company works with its money. At 15.2%, the business is earning real returns, not just noise.
$6M
long-term debt
Debt is small at $6M. That leaves room for mistakes, but not a lot of room for drama.
C++
Strength
  • balance sheet grade C++ — below average — limited financial resources
  • risk rank 2 — safer than 80% of stocks
  • price stability 10 / 100
  • long-term debt $6M (6% of capital)
C++ — risk rank looks solid but balance sheet grade needs watching.
source: institutional data · return history unavailable

Get this snapshot in your inbox

This page, delivered free — plus weekly updates when the numbers change. Plain English, no spam.

Weekly updates Earnings alerts Plain English No spam

The #1 risk is brokerage concentration inside a subscale platform.

!
High
Scale disadvantage
an $86M market cap against a rival like Charles Schwab at about $130B tells you the whole story. bigger brokers can spend more on pricing, compliance, technology, and customer acquisition.
an $86M market cap against a rival like Charles Schwab at about $130B tells you the whole story. bigger brokers can spend more on pricing, compliance, technology, and customer acquisition.
!
High
Brokerage concentration
retail brokerage is about $38M of the $84M revenue base in the segment table—roughly 45% of sales, not 80%+. any slowdown in trading activity still hits first.
retail brokerage is about $38M of the $84M revenue base in the segment table—roughly 45% of sales. concentration is real, but the table does not support an 80% brokerage mix.
Med
Advisory is not diversifying the story
the ~$22M advisory line in the table grew about +6% —better than flat, but still smaller than brokerage. if advisory does not keep scaling, the story stays trading-led.
advisory is ~$22M (~26% of sales) on this page; it needs to compound to diversify away from brokerage cycles.
Med
The tape still looks skeptical
the stock trades at $1.94 versus a 200-day moving average of $2.93. price action is not the business, but it does show the market is not giving this story the benefit of the doubt.
the stock trades at $1.94 versus a 200-day moving average of $2.93. price action is not the business, but it does show the market is not giving this story the benefit of the doubt.
About 45% of revenue is retail brokerage (~$38M) and about 26% is advisory (~$22M) on the table shown—still enough brokerage weight that a weak tape hurts, but the old “81% / $16M flat” lines did not match this snapshot.
Source: institutional data · regulatory filings · risk analysis
Calendar
Q4 2025 and full-year results
march 30, 2026 is the next proof point. consolidated revenue was roughly flat last year at ~$84M—if the next print turns negative or brokerage slips from its ~+3% table pace, treat it as durability risk, not noise.
Segment mix
Advisory has to grow off ~$22M
advisory is ~ 26% of sales here with ~ +6% growth in the table—it is not flat, but it is still smaller than brokerage. the mix question is whether it keeps compounding.
Trend
Watch the gap between $1.94 and $2.93
a move back above the 200-day average would not prove the thesis. it would show the market is starting to believe the numbers again.
Execution risk
Treat the ai partnership like a maybe until dollars show up
the next securities agreement sounds useful. without disclosed economics or timing, you should file it under optionality, not valuation support.
earnings predictability
40 / 100
profits have been inconsistent. in human-speak: do not treat one clean quarter like a new permanent baseline.
price stability
10 / 100
this stock is volatile even by small-cap standards. that matters because low liquidity can amplify every move.
Source: institutional data

institutional ownership data for SIEB is being compiled.

Source: institutional data
3-5 year target range
$2 Current price
Target midpoint · from current
target data not available

Want the deeper analysis?

The full deep dive: DCF model, scenario analysis, competitive moat breakdown, and quarterly tracking — everything on this page, taken further.

See plans from $5/mo
SIEB
XVARY Deep Dive
sieb
The full analysis is in the works.
What you'll get
DCF valuation model
Bull / base / bear scenarios
Competitive moat breakdown
Quarterly earnings tracker
Operating model projections
Risk matrix with kill criteria
Original price target + conviction
Updated with every earnings
Free · no spam · you'll be first to read it