Nakamoto, Inc.

Nakamoto has $3M in revenue and a $177M market cap, so you are paying 59x sales for a Bitcoin story.

If you own NAKA, you’re betting a $177M company can grow far past $3M in sales.

naka

financials small cap updated mar 20, 2026
$0.26
market cap ~$177M · 52-week range $0–$35
xvary composite: insufficient data
not enough institutional data to compute a composite score for this company
Start here if you're new
what it is
Nakamoto buys Bitcoin-linked businesses and uses a Bitcoin balance sheet to build a capital markets platform.
how it gets paid
Last year Nakamoto made $3M in revenue. BTC Inc. media and events was the main engine at $1.2M, or 40% of sales.
what just happened
Revenue hit $1M, but EPS stayed deep in the red at -$1.24.
At a glance
n/a balance sheet
-$0.67 fy2024 eps est
$3M fy2024 rev est
n/a operating margin
~$177M market cap
What they do
Nakamoto buys Bitcoin-linked businesses and uses a Bitcoin balance sheet to build a capital markets platform.
Nakamoto is trying to bundle media, advisory, and treasury work around one asset. That gives you one story across 61 employees, not three random startups. It also already bought BTC Inc. and UTXO Management in February 2026, so the company is not just talking about the plan.
financials micro-cap bitcoin-treasury m&a crypto
How they make money
$3M annual revenue
BTC Inc. media and events
$1.2M
UTXO Management advisory
$0.8M
Bitcoin treasury operations
$0.6M
Other Bitcoin-native services
$0.4M
The products that matter
bitcoin media and services
Bitcoin Services & Media
$1.98M · 66% of revenue
it is the larger of the two disclosed revenue buckets, but $1.98M is still tiny for a public company carrying a $177M market cap.
main revenue line
asset management
UTXO Management
$1.02M · 34% of revenue
this segment contributes the other $1.02M. in plain English: the business is currently too small for any single segment to hide weak execution.
second revenue line
acquisition strategy
BTC Inc. + UTXO deal
365M shares issued
the company paid with 365M shares to assemble scale. that may build a bigger platform, but existing holders pay first through dilution.
thesis watch
Key numbers
$3M
annual revenue
The whole business is tiny, so a small change in sales can move the story fast.
-$0.67
FY2024 EPS
The company lost money per share, so this is still a hope trade, not a cash machine.
-123.1%
op margin
For every $1 of sales, the company lost $1.23 in operations.
$0M
long-term debt
No debt helps the balance sheet, but it does not fix the business model.
Financial health
n/a
strength
  • balance sheet grade n/a
  • long-term debt $0M (0% of capital)
n/a — functional but not a standout on the balance sheet.
Total return vs. market

Return history isn't available for NAKA right now.

source: institutional data · return history unavailable
What just happened
missed estimates
Revenue hit $1M, but EPS stayed deep in the red at -$1.24.
Latest-quarter revenue rose 255% vs. prior year to $1M. EPS was still negative, so the company grew faster while staying unprofitable.
$1M
revenue
-$1.24
eps
+255%
revenue growth
the number that mattered
The $1M quarter matters because it is tiny next to the $177M market cap.
source: company earnings report, 2026

Get this snapshot in your inbox

This page, delivered free — plus weekly updates when the numbers change. plain english, no spam.

weekly updates earnings alerts plain english no spam
What could go wrong

the #1 risk is a post-acquisition business that still cannot turn revenue into a viable operating model.

!
high
operating model still does not work
a n/a net margin on roughly $3M of annual revenue means the current business is not merely unprofitable. it is structurally upside down.
if reported results stay anywhere near this level after integration, the bitcoin flywheel thesis is just branding.
!
high
dilution from the 365M-share acquisition
BTC Inc. and UTXO Management were bought with stock, not cash. that protects the balance sheet, but it spreads future upside across a much larger share base.
the combined company has to earn that dilution back with better revenue, better margins, or both.
med
bitcoin ecosystem exposure
the strategy is bitcoin-native by design. that means sentiment, transaction activity, and the broader crypto cycle can influence the operating story even when company-specific execution has not changed.
you are taking operating risk and asset-class risk at the same time.
med
thin coverage and limited external validation
there is no composite score, institutional ownership data is still being compiled, and formal analyst ranking data is sparse.
when coverage is thin, you have fewer outside checks on management claims and deal economics.
with roughly $3M in annual revenue, a n/a net margin, and a 365M-share acquisition already in the story, even modest execution misses can matter more than the bitcoin narrative.
source: institutional data · regulatory filings · risk analysis
Pay attention to
metric
reported revenue after the deal closes into the numbers
the current base is only about $3M. if reported revenue barely moves once BTC Inc. and UTXO are fully reflected, the acquisition thesis gets very thin very fast.
risk
share-count pressure from the 365M-share transaction
stock-funded deals can work, but only if the assets bought create more value than the dilution destroys. that is the trade you own here.
calendar
the first clean reported period for the combined company
that will be the first real test of whether this is becoming an operating business or staying a sequence of announcements.
trend
gross margin staying high while net margin stays absurdly negative
98.84% gross margin versus -n/a net margin is the whole mystery. if that gap does not narrow, scale alone will not save the model.
Analyst rankings
coverage
thin
formal analyst coverage is limited. in human-speak, you should not expect a neat wall street consensus here.
earnings visibility
low
with about $3M in annual revenue and an acquisition-driven story, the next reported numbers matter more than target prices.
valuation signal
speculative
there is no stable earnings base to anchor a traditional multiple. this is narrative-heavy until the operating data improves.
source: institutional data
Institutional activity

institutional ownership data for NAKA is being compiled.

source: institutional data
Price targets
3-5 year target range
n/a n/a
$0 current price
n/a target midpoint · n/a from current
target data not available

Want the deeper analysis?

The full deep dive: dcf model, scenario analysis, competitive moat breakdown, and quarterly tracking — everything on this page, taken further.

see plans from $5/mo
The deep dive
NAKA
xvary deep dive
naka
the full analysis is in the works.
what you'll get
dcf valuation model
bull / base / bear scenarios
competitive moat breakdown
quarterly earnings tracker
operating model projections
risk matrix with kill criteria
original price target + conviction
updated with every earnings
free · no spam · you'll be first to read it