XVARY Composite Score
Weak
Combines growth, value, risk, and momentum factors into a single institutional-grade score.
Start here if you're new
What it is
Manitowoc makes cranes and lifting equipment for construction sites worldwide.
How it gets paid
Last year Manitowoc made $2.2B in revenue. Aftermarket and non-new machine sales was the main engine at $0.69B, or 31% of sales.
Why it's growing
Revenue grew 2.9% last year. The $0.26 EPS print mattered most because the business still only posted 18.6% gross margin.
What just happened
Manitowoc missed by 10.3% as EPS came in at $0.26 versus $0.29 expected.
At a Glance
B balance sheet — gets the job done, barely
20/100 earnings predictability — expect surprises
37.5x trailing p/e — you're paying up for this one
5.5% return on capital — nothing to write home about
$1.15 fy2027 eps est
XVARY composite: 38/100 — weak
What They Do
Manitowoc makes cranes and lifting equipment for construction sites worldwide.
You do not replace a crane maker with 4,800 employees because the job site feels bored. Manitowoc had $690M in non-new machine sales, so your machine keeps paying for parts and service after the first sale.
industrials
small-cap
capital-goods
construction
cranes
How They Make Money
$2.2B
annual revenue · their business grew +2.9% last year
Aftermarket and non-new machine sales
$0.69B
+10.0%
Lattice-boom cranes
$0.58B
0.0%
Mobile telescopic cranes and boom trucks
$0.41B
0.0%
The Products That Matter
Heavy-lift crane systems
Lattice-boom cranes
part of a $2.2B business
these are core machines in the same $2.2B revenue base, and demand rises or falls with large construction and infrastructure projects.
cyclical demand
Vertical construction equipment
Tower cranes
18.6% gross margin
in a business keeping 18.6% of revenue after direct costs, pricing discipline matters because there is not much room for mistakes.
thin cushion
Mobile lifting equipment
Mobile telescopic cranes
1.9% net margin
when the company keeps about 2 cents of every sales dollar, product mix and manufacturing execution do the heavy lifting.
execution story
Key Numbers
37.5x
trailing p/e
You pay 37.5 times last year's profit for a business with 1.9% net margin.
$2.2B
annual sales
This is a $2.2B business, so the $475M market cap is not a typo.
18.6%
gross margin
That leaves a thin cushion against steel, freight, and pricing pressure.
$480M
long-term debt
Debt equals 50% of capital, so balance sheet mistakes cost real money.
Financial Health
-
balance sheet grade
B — adequate — nothing special
-
risk rank
4 — safer than 20% of stocks
-
price stability
20 / 100
-
long-term debt
$480M (50% of capital)
-
net profit margin
1.9% — keeps 2 cents of every dollar in revenue
-
return on equity
6% — $0.06 profit for every $1 investors have put in
B — functional but not a standout on the balance sheet.
Total Return vs. Market
You invested $10000 in MTW 3 years ago → it's now worth $10180.
The index would have given you $14770.
same period. same starting point. MTW trailed the market by $4,590.
source: institutional data · total return
What Just Happened
missed estimates
Manitowoc missed by 10.3% as EPS came in at $0.26 versus $0.29 expected.
Revenue was $1.6B, and gross margin was 18.6%. Sales held up, but profit did not.
the number that mattered
The $0.26 EPS print mattered most because the business still only posted 18.6% gross margin.
-
Manitowoc probably closed 2025 with a strong performance in the fourth quarter. (the company was scheduled to release december-interim results after we went to press with this report.) healthy overall demand from the americas and tower cranes across europe enabled the manufacturer to generate a from a year ago 16% order increase, to $490 million, in the september period.
-
The influx of business resulted in a nearly 5% backlog gain, to roughly $665 million.
good health in these countries, when combined with progress under the cranes+50 strategy, is helping manitowoc to mitigate the negative impact of tariffs.
-
Specifically, the 50% tariff on steel likely added $44 million in costs during 2025.
-
Management expects defensive measures to offset 80%-90% of these costs.
-
Momentum will likely accelerate in 2026.
business in north america stands to benefit from the fact that dealer inventories surrounding various crane products are modest.
source: company earnings report, 2026
Get this snapshot in your inbox
This page, delivered free — plus weekly updates when the numbers change. Plain English, no spam.
Weekly updates
Earnings alerts
Plain English
No spam
What Could Go Wrong
The top risk is tariffs and input-cost inflation in crane manufacturing.
Tariffs on global equipment inputs
mar 6, 2026 — investors reacted to a 15% global tariff. for a company with 18.6% gross margin, that can squeeze profitability fast.
current flagged exposure: $220M–$330M of revenue
Supply chain disruption and higher input costs
feb 18, 2026 — the annual filing called out increased input costs and supply chain disruption. with only a 1.9% net margin, there is not much buffer.
current flagged exposure: ~$220M of revenue
Thin margins meeting meaningful debt
MTW carries $480M of long-term debt against a $475M market cap. if revenue softens or margins slip below 1.9%, the balance sheet stops looking merely adequate.
balance-sheet pressure is tied to 50% of capital in long-term debt
based on the current risk flags, roughly $220M–$330M of revenue is exposed if tariffs, input costs, and execution pressure hit at the same time.
Source: institutional data · regulatory filings · risk analysis
Pay Attention To
#
Metric
1.9% net margin
this is the whole story. if MTW cannot keep more than about 2 cents of every revenue dollar, the valuation discount will keep making sense.
#
Trend
The path from $2.2B to $3B in revenue
the street sees that jump by fy2029. revenue growth matters, but only if it comes with better margins than the business shows today.
!
Risk
Tariffs and input costs
the recent 15% global tariff headline is not abstract. an 18.6% gross margin business feels cost inflation quickly.
cal
Calendar
The next earnings print
with 20/100 earnings predictability, each quarterly release matters more than usual. this is not a set-it-and-forget-it industrial name.
Analyst Rankings
earnings predictability
20 / 100
earnings are hard to model here. in human-speak, analysts do not trust this company to deliver smooth quarters.
risk rank
4
that places MTW on the riskier side of the market. you are not buying this for stability.
price stability
20 / 100
the stock price has not been especially stable. the operating business and the share chart tell the same story.
Source: institutional data
Institutional Activity
63 buyers vs. 83 sellers in 3q2025. total institutional holdings: 26.7M shares.
source: institutional data · 1q2025-3q2025
Source: institutional data
Price Targets
3-5 year target range
$4
$18
$11
Target midpoint · 16% from current · 3-5yr high: $25 (+90% · 18% ann'l return)
source: institutional data · analyst targets
Want the deeper analysis?
The full deep dive: DCF model, scenario analysis, competitive moat breakdown, and quarterly tracking — everything on this page, taken further.
See plans from $5/mo
The Deep Dive
MTW
XVARY Deep Dive
mtw
The full analysis is in the works.
What you'll get
DCF valuation model
Bull / base / bear scenarios
Competitive moat breakdown
Quarterly earnings tracker
Operating model projections
Risk matrix with kill criteria
Original price target + conviction
Updated with every earnings
Free · no spam · you'll be first to read it