Start here if you're new
what it is
Kinetik moves natural gas and liquids through pipes, then processes and treats them for producers in the Permian Basin.
how it gets paid
Last year Kinetik made $1.8B in revenue. Gathering was the main engine at $0.60B, or 33% of sales.
why it's growing
Revenue grew 19.0% last year on a ~$1.8B base. The latest quarter can print a much larger vs. prior year jump after M&A—do not annualize one quarter without checking the comp.
what just happened
A feed shows ~$1.3B on a line labeled like a quarter, which does not reconcile as GAAP net revenue vs the ~$1.8B FY total—four quarters at that pace would blow past the year. Treat it as mislabeled period, pass-through/gross, or post-M&A mapping noise; anchor mix to the $1.8B bridge. EPS ~$0.41 on the same print is still a quarterly read.
At a glance
B+ balance sheet — decent shape, but not bulletproof
25.6x trailing p/e — priced about right
7.7% dividend yield — cash in your pocket every quarter
7.0% return on capital — nothing to write home about
xvary composite: 45/100 — below average
What they do
Kinetik moves natural gas and liquids through pipes, then processes and treats them for producers in the Permian Basin.
You do not leave a 200-mile pipe network easily. Kinetik's Permian footprint and the King's Landing plant added about 10% to processing capacity in September 2025. If your volumes are already inside the system, switching hurts.
How they make money
$1.8B
annual revenue · their business grew +19.0% last year
Gathering
$0.60B
+22.0%
Processing
$0.45B
+18.0%
Transportation
$0.30B
+15.0%
Compression
$0.25B
+12.0%
Treating
$0.20B
+10.0%
The products that matter
core gas gathering and transportation
Gas Gathering
~$0.60B · ~33% of ~$1.8B sales
gathering is the largest reported line in the mix, but processing, transport, compression, and treating make up the rest—still one integrated midstream toll on Permian volumes.
largest segment
Key numbers
54%
target gap
A $65 target versus $42.25 gives you a 54% spread. That is the market saying the stock is cheaper than the published view.
7.7%
dividend yield
You get $7.70 a year for every $100 invested before the stock moves. That is real cash, not a story.
$1.8B
annual revenue
This is the size of the machine paying the dividend. Bigger throughput gives the payout more room.
25.6x
trailing p/e
Price/earnings means stock price divided by profit. You are paying 25.6 times trailing profit for each $1 of earnings.
Financial health
B+
strength
- balance sheet grade B+ — solid but not elite
- risk rank 3 — safer than 50% of stocks
- price stability 50 / 100
- long-term debt $4.0B (37% of capital)
- net profit margin 5.3% — keeps 5 cents of every dollar in revenue
B+ — functional but not a standout on the balance sheet.
Total return vs. market
You invested $10,000 in KNTK 3 years ago → it's now worth $18,310.
The index would have given you $13,880.
source: institutional data · total return
What just happened
beat estimates
A feed shows ~$1.3B on a revenue field and $0.41 quarterly EPS—both up vs the prior-year quarter in the same feed. The ~$1.3B line does not read as one quarter of the same GAAP net revenue as ~$1.8B FY; verify period and definition in the filing.
Throughput and M&A can inflate headline revenue fields. EPS moved on volume hitting a largely fixed-cost system—still compare GAAP vs adjusted and the exact quarter before trusting a single growth %.
~$1.3B
rev (feed · verify)
$0.41
eps (q)
↑ vs. prior year
revenue vs prior Q
the number that mattered
The throughput story matters, but the headline revenue field has to match the ~$1.8B annual bridge—if it implies four quarters above FY sales, you are looking at a different metric or a mapping error.
-
kinetik holdings likely closed out 2025 with solid fourth-quarter financial results.
-
coverage still debates how much vs. prior year revenue growth is organic volume versus deal math—read the filing comp, not just the headline %.
-
most of this expected growth can be attributed to recent pipeline acquisitions.
-
the opening of king's landing processing plant in september 2025 added roughly 10% to processing capacity, though ramping was slow.
-
we expect that fourth-quarter earnings faltered sequentially because of lower capital utilization tied to curtailed volumes.
source: company earnings report, 2026
Get this snapshot in your inbox
This page, delivered free — plus weekly updates when the numbers change. plain english, no spam.
weekly updates
earnings alerts
plain english
no spam
What could go wrong
the main risk is simple: if Permian volumes soften, Kinetik still has to support a 7.7% dividend with $4.0B of long-term debt and only a ~5.3% net margin.
med
producer activity slows
Kinetik gets paid when customers send gas through its system. If drilling or completion activity cools, the pipes do not disappear, but the revenue tied to throughput can flatten.
that hits the same $1.8B revenue base supporting the dividend story.
med
debt gets louder when margins stay thin
$4.0B of long-term debt equals 37% of capital. That is manageable when operations are steady. It matters more when the business keeps only ~5.3% net margin on this feed—thin, not luxurious.
if volumes wobble, financing risk stops being background noise and becomes part of the thesis.
med
the dividend can outshine the business
a 7.7% yield is the obvious selling point. A 25.6x trailing p/e is the less obvious catch. That pairing works only if earnings and cash generation keep improving.
if the yield stays high because the market doubts the payout, you are not getting free income. you are getting paid to carry uncertainty.
med
growth expectations are already on the page
the street is looking for revenue to move from $1.8B to $2B and EPS to rise from $1.65 to $1.90. Those are not heroic numbers, but they still require execution.
if Kinetik delivers stability instead of growth, the stock can stall even if the payout holds.
the stock does not need a collapse to disappoint you. it just needs throughput to flatten while margins stay near 4.0%.
source: institutional data · regulatory filings · risk analysis
Pay attention to
metric
watch revenue against the $2B estimate
the market wants to see growth beyond the current $1.8B base. if revenue stalls, the multiple starts to look like wishful thinking.
trend
track the EPS path, not just the annual total
One vendor sequence showed Q3 ~$0.52 then a weaker print ~$0.37, while the headline quarter on this page carries ~$0.41 EPS—line up fiscal labels in the filing before you declare a trend.
risk
keep debt in the same frame as margin
$4.0B of long-term debt matters more when net margin is ~5.3% here. if you watch one without the other, you miss the actual tension in the story.
calendar
the next earnings print needs to show operating improvement
with shares near the top of the $31–$42 range, investors need more than a stable payout. they need evidence fy2026 can move toward the $1.90 EPS target.
Analyst rankings
short-term outlook
below average
momentum score 4 — in human-speak, analysts do not expect this to be a near-term market leader.
risk profile
average
stability score 3 — middle of the pack. not especially safe, not flashing distress either.
chart momentum
bottom 5%
technical score 5 — the chart is arguing with the long-range target. one of them will have to give.
source: institutional data
Institutional activity
institutions have been net buying for 3 consecutive quarters — 148 buyers vs. 141 sellers in 3q2025. total institutional holdings: 62.6M shares. net buying for 3 quarters.
source: institutional data
Price targets
3-5 year target range
$35
$94
$42
current price
$65
target midpoint · +54% from current · 3-5yr high: $75 (+80% · 20% ann'l return)
Want the deeper analysis?
The full deep dive: dcf model, scenario analysis, competitive moat breakdown, and quarterly tracking — everything on this page, taken further.
see plans from $5/moThe deep dive