Start here if you're new
what it is
Intrusion sells 3 security tools that spot bad network traffic and help stop it.
how it gets paid
Last year Intrusion made $6M in revenue.
what just happened
Revenue hit $6.0M and gross margin stayed at 76.2%, while EPS was -$0.32.
At a glance
C++ balance sheet — some cracks in the foundation
15/100 earnings predictability — expect surprises
-$1.63 fy2024 eps est
$6M fy2024 rev est
n/a operating margin
xvary composite: 31/100 — weak
What they do
Intrusion sells 3 security tools that spot bad network traffic and help stop it.
You are not paying for scale. You are paying for a threat-intel database (a list of bad internet addresses) and 3 products. Your team has to replace reputation checks, forensics, and live monitoring at once. Gross margin → money left after direct costs → 76.2% says the product layer works, while operating margin → profit after running the business → -146.4% says overhead still wins.
How they make money
$6M
annual revenue
total revenue
$6M
n/a
The products that matter
threat prevention platform
Shield
aws marketplace · 2025 launch
Shield is the product that has to pull revenue higher from here. Its cloud version launched on AWS Marketplace in 2025, which matters because distribution is half the battle for a company doing only $6M in annual revenue.
core bet
historical threat data feed
Threat Intelligence Database
8B+ known threats
This database powers Shield and contains data on over 8 billion known threats. That's the intellectual property angle, but data alone is not a moat if the business around it stays this small.
data asset
law enforcement cyber shield
P.O.S.S.E. Program
launched feb 2026
The P.O.S.S.E. program launched in February 2026 to deploy on-premise devices for law enforcement agencies. With quarterly sales at just $2.0M, even modest contract wins could matter.
new channel
Key numbers
$6.0M
annual revenue
That is the whole top line from EDGAR. With $6.0M, one deal matters.
76.2%
gross margin
gross margin → money left after direct costs → 76.2% says the software still sells cleanly.
n/a
operating margin
Prior margin KPI failed sanity check — verify in filings. operating margin → profit after running the business → -146.4% means overhead ate more than sales paid for.
$1M
long-term debt
$1M of long-term debt is only 6% of capital, so leverage is small, but the balance sheet is still just C++.
Financial health
C++
strength
- balance sheet grade C++ — below average — limited financial resources
- risk rank 5 — safer than 5% of stocks
- price stability 5 / 100
- long-term debt $1M (6% of capital)
C++ — below average. watch for debt servicing and cash burn.
Total return vs. market
Return history isn't available for INTZ right now.
source: institutional data · return history unavailable
What just happened
missed estimates
Revenue hit $6.0M and gross margin stayed at 76.2%, while EPS was -$0.32.
EDGAR shows revenue at $6M, up 186% vs. prior year, but EPS was -$0.32. Revenue grew; losses still showed up.
$6.0M
revenue
-$0.32
eps
76.2%
gross margin
gross margin
76.2% gross margin means direct costs took less than a quarter of sales, but the -n/a operating margin says overhead still crushed the result.
source: company earnings report, 2026
Get this snapshot in your inbox
This page, delivered free — plus weekly updates when the numbers change. plain english, no spam.
weekly updates
earnings alerts
plain english
no spam
What could go wrong
the #1 risk is going-concern pressure from recurring operating losses.
med
losses still exceed revenue
In the latest quarter, INTZ reported $2.0M of revenue and a $2.1M net loss. That means the business is not just unprofitable. It is losing more than it sells.
If that pattern continues, management's strategic options narrow fast and capital raising becomes the real operating story.
med
the revenue base is too small for public-company overhead
Annual revenue is only $6M. One customer win can help. One delay can hurt. That is not scale. That is fragility.
When the base is this small, modest commercial misses can keep the whole company stuck below breakeven.
med
product launches still need to convert into real sales
Shield reached AWS Marketplace in 2025 and P.O.S.S.E. launched in February 2026. Those are progress points, not proof. The company still has to turn launches into contracts.
If new channels do not lift revenue above the current $2.0M quarterly run rate, the turnaround case weakens quickly.
med
micro-cap volatility can make financing expensive
INTZ has a $21M market cap, trades between $1 and $3 over the last 52 weeks, and carries a 5 / 100 price stability score. That is not a gentle setup for fresh capital.
If outside funding is needed, dilution risk rises because the equity currency is already thin and volatile.
A business doing $2.0M in quarterly sales while losing $2.1M does not get to separate operating risk from financing risk. They are the same problem.
source: institutional data · regulatory filings · risk analysis
Pay attention to
earnings
Q4 & FY 2025 results on march 24, 2026
You want to see whether revenue can stay above the current $2.0M quarterly level and whether losses start moving the other way.
trend
revenue growth versus loss growth
The last quarter showed 31% revenue growth, but the company still lost $2.1M. Growth only counts if it starts outrunning the burn.
risk
going-concern language in filings
If that language persists, the market will keep treating INTZ as a survival case first and a product story second.
metric
76.2% gross margin holding up
You need the software economics to stay intact while management tries to scale. If margin cracks too, the bull case gets much harder to defend.
Analyst rankings
earnings predictability
15 / 100
In human-speak: analysts do not have a stable earnings pattern to work with, so surprises are part of the package.
risk rank
5
Safer than 5% of stocks means riskier than 95% of them. That is the opposite of a margin-of-safety setup.
beta
1.2
Beta measures how much a stock moves versus the market. At 1.2, INTZ tends to move a bit more than the index, and micro-cap fundamentals can amplify that.
source: institutional data
Institutional activity
institutional ownership data for INTZ is being compiled.
source: institutional data
Price targets
3-5 year target range
n/a
n/a
$1
current price
n/a
target midpoint · n/a from current
Want the deeper analysis?
The full deep dive: dcf model, scenario analysis, competitive moat breakdown, and quarterly tracking — everything on this page, taken further.
see plans from $5/moThe deep dive