Start here if you're new
what it is
AstroNova sells industrial label printers, aircraft cockpit printers, and data-capture systems to niche customers that hate downtime.
how it gets paid
Last year Astronova made $151M in revenue. QuickLabel printing systems and supplies was the main engine at $52M, or 34% of sales.
why it's growing
Revenue grew 2.2% last year. 34.1% gross margin matters because margin → money left after production costs → so what: if that number does not keep rising.
what just happened
Revenue jumped to $113M, but EPS still came in at -$0.16.
At a glance
C++ balance sheet — some cracks in the foundation
20/100 earnings predictability — expect surprises
6.0% return on capital — nothing to write home about
-$0.77 fy2024 eps est
$151M fy2024 rev est
xvary composite: 46/100 — below average
What they do
AstroNova sells industrial label printers, aircraft cockpit printers, and data-capture systems to niche customers that hate downtime.
This is a niche machine business, not a mass-market gadget story. AstroNova has 441 employees and sells into aerospace, packaging, and industrial workflows where a bad printer can stop your line or your cockpit paperwork. That creates switching costs (leaving is painful) → customers stay with what works → so what: small incumbents can keep selling even without huge scale.
How they make money
$151M
annual revenue · their business grew +2.2% last year
QuickLabel printing systems and supplies
$52M
TrojanLabel specialty label printers
$26M
GetLabels media and label supply sales
$15M
Aerospace flight deck printers
$34M
Data acquisition and analysis systems
$24M
The products that matter
industrial labeling hardware
Product Identification
$103M · 68% of revenue
this is the core business at $103M in revenue. it grew 1.5% last year, which tells you demand exists but momentum is not exactly sprinting.
core revenue base
aerospace data acquisition
Test & Measurement
$48M · 32% of revenue
this segment brought in about $48M and grew 3.8%. it's the smaller business, but it is growing faster and carries the better strategic story.
faster segment
Key numbers
5.7%
operating margin
Operating margin → money left after running the business → so what: AstroNova is still losing money on its core operations.
$151M
annual revenue
Revenue → total sales → so what: this is a real operating business, just not a very efficient one yet.
$21M
long-term debt
Long-term debt → money owed over years → so what: debt equals about one-third of its $66M market value.
6.0%
return on capital
Return on capital → profit generated from money invested → so what: 6.0% is mediocre for a hardware company taking this much execution risk.
Financial health
C++
strength
- balance sheet grade C++ — below average — limited financial resources
- risk rank 3 — safer than 50% of stocks
- price stability 35 / 100
- long-term debt $21M (25% of capital)
C++ — below average. watch for debt servicing and cash burn.
Total return vs. market
Return history isn't available for ALOT right now.
source: institutional data · return history unavailable
What just happened
missed estimates
Revenue jumped to $113M, but EPS still came in at -$0.16.
That is the whole AstroNova story right now. Sales were up 188% vs. prior year, but the company still posted a per-share loss, which tells you scale has not fixed profitability yet.
$113M
revenue
$0.16
eps
34.1%
gross margin
the number that mattered
34.1% gross margin matters because margin → money left after production costs → so what: if that number does not keep rising, revenue growth alone will not rescue earnings.
source: company earnings report, 2026
Get this snapshot in your inbox
This page, delivered free — plus weekly updates when the numbers change. plain english, no spam.
weekly updates
earnings alerts
plain english
no spam
What could go wrong
the #1 risk here is margin pressure in a niche hardware business without pricing power. when gross margin is 32.2% and analysts still expect a loss, small operational misses stop being small.
med
pricing pressure and tech obsolescence
Astronova sells specialized hardware into markets where lower-cost competitors and changing technology can reset the playing field quickly. The current 32.2% gross margin does not leave much room to absorb discounting.
if pricing slips, the path from $151M of revenue to consistent profits gets longer, not shorter.
med
supply chain and input-cost shocks
management has cited supply chain disruption and supplier price increases as real business risks. For a hardware company, delayed parts and higher component costs show up directly in shipments and margins.
that would pressure the same gross margin that just improved by 400 basis points in Q3.
med
CEO transition may not be enough
Jorik Ittmann started in august 2025. The stock rose 2% on the news, then short interest surged 49.2% in march 2026. That's not a market giving management the benefit of the doubt.
if the next few quarters do not build on Q3's profit, the leadership change starts to look cosmetic.
med
balance sheet flexibility is limited
a C++ balance sheet and $21M of long-term debt equal to 25% of capital are manageable, but not luxurious. Loss-making small caps do not get endless retries.
if earnings disappoint again, the company has fewer options than a better-capitalized peer.
with $21M of long-term debt, a C++ balance sheet, and only 32.2% gross margin, Astronova does not have much buffer if the new CEO fails to turn one improved quarter into a pattern.
source: institutional data · regulatory filings · risk analysis
Pay attention to
earnings
Q4 FY26 earnings report
estimated for thursday, march 19, 2026. you want to see whether Q3's $0.4M profit and 400-basis-point margin lift were the start of something or a one-quarter cameo.
margin
gross margin trend
the margin improvement from the prior quarter was the best piece of recent news. if that reverses, the turnaround pitch gets thinner fast.
sentiment
next short-interest report
short interest jumped 49.2% in march 2026. another step up would tell you skeptics still think Q3 changed less than it seemed.
mix
whether Test & Measurement keeps outgrowing Product Identification
3.8% growth versus 1.5% is not a huge gap, but it points to where the better story is. if the smaller segment keeps leading, the business mix starts to improve.
Analyst rankings
earnings predictability
20 / 100
in human-speak, analysts do not trust this business to produce smooth quarterly numbers.
balance sheet grade
C++
below average balance sheet grade. not distress, but not a safety blanket either.
risk rank
3
middle-of-the-road risk. the problem is less collapse risk and more execution risk.
source: institutional data
Institutional activity
institutional ownership data for ALOT is being compiled.
source: institutional data
Price targets
3-5 year target range
n/a
n/a
$9
current price
n/a
target midpoint · n/a from current
Want the deeper analysis?
The full deep dive: dcf model, scenario analysis, competitive moat breakdown, and quarterly tracking — everything on this page, taken further.
see plans from $5/moThe deep dive